'x' number of men can finish a piece of work in 30 days.If there were 6 men more, the work could be finished in 10 days less. The original number of men is?
A. 6
B. 10
C. 12
D. 15
Solution(By Examveda Team)
x men can finish a work in 30 days. It menas they need (x *30) men -days to complete the work.
If there were 6 men more, then
No. of men now = (x +6)
They can finish the work in (30 -10) days = 20 days.
They need [(x+6) *20] men days to complete the work.
In the both case they are finishing the same work. That is
Work in first case = Work in second case
Thus,
x * 30 = (x +6) *20
30x = 20x + 120
10x = 120
x = 12 men.
Original number of men = 12
Join The Discussion
Comments ( 6 )
Which of the following is not a primary function of a Bank?
A. Granting Loans
B. Collecting Cheques/Drafts customers
C. Facilitating import of goods
D. Issuing Bank Drafts
A. Regulatory jurisdictional fight between SEBI and IRDA
B. They don’t offer better tax benefits
C. They offer lesser returns compared to traditional insurance policies
D. All of the above
The Chameli Devi Jain Award is given for an outstanding woman ____?
A. Scientist
B. Reporter
C. Player
D. Teacher
Very nice solution
thanks examveda..
If we do this question by option checkiing ..
then..
A) let x=6
total work must be remain the same
6*30=180
after increasing 6 men
(6+6)*(30-10)=240
180 nnot equal to 240
B)10*30=300
(10+6)*(30-10)=320
c)12*30=360
(12+6)*(30-10)=360
therefore C is correct
Thanks TEAM EXAMVEDA........
Here, my Method is Men one days work is 1/30-----(1)
whereas Men one days work is 1/20------(2)
Now subtracting (2)-(1) i.e.
X+6 men one days work - X men one Days work= 1/20-1/30;
X+6-x= 1/20-1/30... i.e.,
6 men one days work is 1/60...
Now from this one man one days work is 1/360.
now From initial statement 1 X men finish a piece of work in 30 days...
so (1/360)*X*30=1
by solving this we will get X = 12;
So initially 12 men present...
I think both methods are good. However, Through work equivalence it could be done in one line:
x*30 = (x +6)*20 x= 12 men.
Good explanation @Leelanand.