45.
Decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kusum Ignots and Alloys Limited v. Union of India, (2004) 6 SCC 254 relates to:

46.
Match List-I with List-Il and select the correct answer:
List I (Article No.) List II (Matter Dealt)
a. 50 1. Free Legal Aid
b. 43 2. Separation of Judiciary
c. 44 3. Living Wages for Workers
d. 39A 4. Uniform Civil Code

50.
Article 74(2) the question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the President shall not be inquired into in any court.
In the light of article 74(2) and decided cases, test the correctness of the following statements:
Statement 1. The Courts are justified in probing as to whether there was any material on the basis of which the advice was given, and whether it was relevant for such advice and the President could have acted on it.
Statement 2. When the Courts undertake an enquiry into the existence of such material, the prohibition contained in article 74(2) does not negate their right to know about the factual existence of any such material.