Constitution Of India MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-2 section-33

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19 Section 20 Section 21 Section 22 Section 23 Section 24 Section 25 Section 26 Section 27 Section 28 Section 29 Section 30 Section 31 Section 32 Section 33 Section 34 Section 35 Section 36 Section 37 Section 38

11.
The fundamental right can never be amended as it beyond the purview of the parliament', such ruling was given in

A. Keshwanand Bharti Case

B. Golaknath v. State of Punjab

C. Golaknath v. State of Kerala

D. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

12.
When the Court declares certain provisions of any Act invalid, it does not affect the validity of the Act, it remains as it is. It is . . . . . . . .

A. Doctrine of Severability

B. Doctrine of eclipse

C. Doctrine of prospective overruling

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

13.
After the new provision made by the Vice-President Pension (Amendment) Act in December 2008 the pension of Vice-President of India is fixed

A. 50% of his monthly salary rather than Rs. 20,000 per month

B. 45% of his monthly salary rather than Rs. 20,000 per month

C. 40% of his monthly salary rather than Rs. 20,000 per month

D. 35% of his monthly salary rather than Rs. 20,000 per month

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

14.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court established the relationship between Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution?

A. R. C. Cooper v. Union of India

B. A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras

C. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

D. Minerva Mills v. Union of India

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

15.
The President of India has the power to veto a Bill passed by the two Houses of the Parliament, but it can be over-ruled, if

A. The Parliament declares the Bill to be of national interests

B. The Bill is repassed by the two Houses of the Parliament

C. The Supreme Court declares the veto ultra vires

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

16.
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer:

List I List II

a. Ex-post facto laws 1. Indirect interference in the field of another Legislature

b. Colourable legislation 2. To maintain balance between provisions of law in case of conflict

c. Harmonious Construction 3. One cannot be punished for an act that was not declared as an offence at the time of doing the act

d. Severability 4. Only such provisions of an Act are void which are inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights

A. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3

B. a-3, b-2, c-1, d-4

C. a-4, b-2, c-1, d-3

D. a-3, b-1, c-2, d-4

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

17.
Consider the following statements with regard to protection in respect of conviction for offences:
1. In the case of Sampath Kumar v. Enforcement Directorate, Madras, it was held that it is unconstitutional to give a caution to speak the truth.
2. No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
3. No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.
4. Criminal law in India can be enacted retrospectively.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A. 1, 2 and 4

B. 2, 3 and 4

C. 2 and 3

D. 3 only

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

18.
In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?

A. The question of repugnancy under Art. 254(1) between a law made by Parliament and a law made by the State legislature arises only in case both the legislations occupy the same field with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List

B. There has to be a direct conflict between the two laws

C. Both A and B have to be satisfied

D. If the laws overlap repugnancy will invariably arise

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

19.
The Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction in a dispute between:

A. Two or more states

B. The Government of India and any state on the one-side one or more states on the other

C. A state-owned public corporation and Government of India not involving fundamental rights

D. The government of India and one or more states

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

20.
Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom:

A. To form trade unions

B. To form associations or unions

C. To form associations

D. To form associations or unions, cooperative societies

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

List I	List II
a. Ex-post facto laws	1. Indirect interference in the field of another Legislature
b. Colourable legislation	2. To maintain balance between provisions of law in case of conflict
c. Harmonious Construction	3. One cannot be punished for an act that was not declared as an offence at the time of doing the act
d. Severability	4. Only such provisions of an Act are void which are inconsistent with the Fundamental Rights

Constitution Of India MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

11. The fundamental right can never be amended as it beyond the purview of the parliament', such ruling was given in

Answer & Solution

12. When the Court declares certain provisions of any Act invalid, it does not affect the validity of the Act, it remains as it is. It is . . . . . . . .

Answer & Solution

13. After the new provision made by the Vice-President Pension (Amendment) Act in December 2008 the pension of Vice-President of India is fixed

Answer & Solution

14. In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court established the relationship between Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution?

Answer & Solution

15. The President of India has the power to veto a Bill passed by the two Houses of the Parliament, but it can be over-ruled, if

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

18. In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?

Answer & Solution

19. The Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction in a dispute between:

Answer & Solution

20. Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom:

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Constitution of India)

11.
The fundamental right can never be amended as it beyond the purview of the parliament', such ruling was given in

12.
When the Court declares certain provisions of any Act invalid, it does not affect the validity of the Act, it remains as it is. It is . . . . . . . .

13.
After the new provision made by the Vice-President Pension (Amendment) Act in December 2008 the pension of Vice-President of India is fixed

14.
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court established the relationship between Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution?

15.
The President of India has the power to veto a Bill passed by the two Houses of the Parliament, but it can be over-ruled, if

18.
In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?

19.
The Supreme Court has no original jurisdiction in a dispute between:

20.
Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom: