Indian Contract Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-9 section-8

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15

81.
X' agreed to supply 1000 tons of iron at Rs. 100 per ton to 'Y' to be delivered not later than 31^st January, 2002. 'X' also entered into a contract with 'A' for purchase of 1000 tons of iron at Rs. 80 per ton telling 'A' clearly that the iron is needed before 31^st January, 2002 for supply to 'Y' to fulfil the contract with Y. 'A' fails to supply the iron to 'X' who in tum failed to supply the same to 'Y'. In an action by 'X' against 'A'.

A. X' can recover damages for the loss of profit at the rate of Rs. 20 per ton i.e., the loss of profit

B. X' can recover damages for the loss or profit he would have earned by timely supply to 'Y' and also the damages which 'X' might have paid to 'Y' on account of breach of contract

C. X' can recover damages which 'X' might have paid to 'Y' on account of breach of contract

D. X' can recover damages in the form of penalty

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

82.
Mohoribibi v. Dharmodas Ghose is a case relating to:

A. Partition of property

B. Divorce

C. Minor's contract

D. None of these

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

83.
In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must

A. Be absolute and qualified

B. Be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner

C. Both A and B

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

84.
T' coaches 'M', a minor, who is a student of Secondary School in Mathematics. Though there was no talk between the father of 'M' and 'T' with respect to any remuneration to be paid to 'T' yet the father of 'M' had knowledge of the coaching imparted by 'T'. After 'M' succeeded in his examination. 'T' demanded remuneration from father of 'M'. Which legal principle would govern the case at hand?

A. M' being minor, 'T' would have no claim against any service imparted to 'M'

B. Since the father of 'M' never entered into any any contract with 'T', 'T' will not have any actionable claim

C. T' would be entitled to recover from father of 'M' since father of 'M' has enjoyed the benefit of non-gratuitous act of 'T' that being coaching 'M'

D. The premise would not be covered by any legal principle under the Indian laws

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

85.
A promisee can accept the performance

A. From the promisor himself

B. From the representative of the promisor competent to perform

C. From a third person

D. All the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

86.
A contract between two parties, both labouring under mistake of law is

A. Void

B. Voidable

C. Non est

D. Negotiable

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

87.
Promissory estoppel is sometimes spoken of as a substitute for:

A. Novation

B. Quasi-contract

C. Consideration

D. Coercion

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

88.
Consider the following statements in respect of acceptance:
1. In case of telephonic conversation, the contract is complete when the acceptor speaks the words of acceptance.
2. Conditional or qualified acceptance is also an acceptance.
3. Acceptance should be in the usual prescribed manner.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A. 1 and 2

B. 2 and 3

C. 3 only

D. 1 and 3

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

89.
What is correct of a standard form contract

A. It is a valid contract

B. One party has no choice but to accept & sign the contract

C. Both A and B

D. The consent is not a free consent

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

90.
The display of articles in a showroom with prices amounts to

A. Offer to sell articles at prices mentioned

B. Counter offer

C. Invitation to offer

D. Mere advertisement

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Indian Contract Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Answer & Solution

82. Mohoribibi v. Dharmodas Ghose is a case relating to:

Answer & Solution

83. In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

85. A promisee can accept the performance

Answer & Solution

86. A contract between two parties, both labouring under mistake of law is

Answer & Solution

87. Promissory estoppel is sometimes spoken of as a substitute for:

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

89. What is correct of a standard form contract

Answer & Solution

90. The display of articles in a showroom with prices amounts to

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Indian Contract Act)

82.
Mohoribibi v. Dharmodas Ghose is a case relating to:

83.
In order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must

85.
A promisee can accept the performance

86.
A contract between two parties, both labouring under mistake of law is

87.
Promissory estoppel is sometimes spoken of as a substitute for:

89.
What is correct of a standard form contract

90.
The display of articles in a showroom with prices amounts to