Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-12 section-1

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19

111.
Which one of the following is a leading case on confession to persons in authority?

A. Ramesh Chandra Mehta v. State of W. B.

B. Pyare Lal Bhargawa v. State of Rajasthan

C. Queen Empress v. Babu Lal

D. Sita Ram v. State

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

112.
In which of the following circumstances are there no reasonable grounds for putting the question to the witness?

A. A, a barrister, is told by a solicitor that an important witness is a dacoit. The barrister asks the question "Are you a dacoit?"

B. An advocate is informed by a person in court that an important witness is a dacoit. The informant on being questioned by the advocate gives satisfactory reasons for his statement. The advocate asks this question, "Are you a dacoit?"

C. A witness of whom nothing whatever is known is asked at random whether he is a dacoit

D. A witness of whom nothing whatever is known on being questioned as to his mode of life and means of living gives unsatisfactory answers. The witness is asked, "Are you a dacoit?"

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

113.
Confession of an accused is admissible against the other co-accused

A. Under Section 28 of the Evidence Act

B. Under Section 29 of the Evidence Act

C. Under Section 30 of the Evidence Act

D. Under Section 31 of the Evidence Act

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

114.
To what facts of the following the rules of relevancy have been discussed under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act?

A. Motive

B. Preparation

C. Previous or subsequent conduct

D. All of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

115.
The Court shall not take judicial notice of

A. Geographical divisions of the world

B. Public festivals notified in the official gazette

C. National flag of a foreign country recognized by the Government of India

D. An officer's signature whose appointment is not notified in an official gazette

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

116.
"The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side."
This provision is contained in which Section of the Indian Evidence Act?

A. Section-101

B. Section-111

C. Section-102

D. Section-113

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

117.
Though the contempt proceedings are judicial proceedings, the strict rules of evidence contained in the Evidence Act do not apply to proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act because

A. Of summary nature of inquiry

B. Contempt matters are governed by special Acts

C. Contempt of courts does not require enquiry and the investigation

D. Contempt proceedings are tried in higher judiciary

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

118.
Presumption as to the genuineness of gazettes in electronic form has been dealt with under

A. Section 81A of Evidence Act

B. Section 88A of Evidence Act

C. Section 90A of Evidence Act

D. Section 73Aof Evidence Act

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

119.
The case of Pakala Narayan Swamy v. Emperorpertains to

A. Estoppel

B. Dying declaration

C. Hostile witness

D. Accomplice evidence

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

120.
Secondary evidence is admissible:

A. Where the non-production of primary evidence has not been accounted for

B. Where the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for

C. Irrespective of whether the nonproduction of primary evidence has been accounted for or not

D. Both A and C are correct

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

111. Which one of the following is a leading case on confession to persons in authority?

Answer & Solution

112. In which of the following circumstances are there no reasonable grounds for putting the question to the witness?

Answer & Solution

113. Confession of an accused is admissible against the other co-accused

Answer & Solution

114. To what facts of the following the rules of relevancy have been discussed under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Answer & Solution

115. The Court shall not take judicial notice of

Answer & Solution

116. "The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side." This provision is contained in which Section of the Indian Evidence Act?

Answer & Solution

117. Though the contempt proceedings are judicial proceedings, the strict rules of evidence contained in the Evidence Act do not apply to proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act because

Answer & Solution

118. Presumption as to the genuineness of gazettes in electronic form has been dealt with under

Answer & Solution

119. The case of Pakala Narayan Swamy v. Emperorpertains to

Answer & Solution

120. Secondary evidence is admissible:

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Indian Evidence Act)

111.
Which one of the following is a leading case on confession to persons in authority?

112.
In which of the following circumstances are there no reasonable grounds for putting the question to the witness?

113.
Confession of an accused is admissible against the other co-accused

114.
To what facts of the following the rules of relevancy have been discussed under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act?

115.
The Court shall not take judicial notice of

116.
"The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side."
This provision is contained in which Section of the Indian Evidence Act?

117.
Though the contempt proceedings are judicial proceedings, the strict rules of evidence contained in the Evidence Act do not apply to proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act because

118.
Presumption as to the genuineness of gazettes in electronic form has been dealt with under

119.
The case of Pakala Narayan Swamy v. Emperorpertains to

120.
Secondary evidence is admissible: