61.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the rule of prudence requires that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by some other evidence:

64.
Whenever it is provided in the Indian Evidence Act that the Court may presume a fact

65.
Under section 9 of Evidence Act

66.
Which of the following section of the Indian Evidence Act does not apply to interrogations by a Customs Officer exercising power under Section 171-A of the Sea Customs Act?

67.
In which one of the following cases, the Supreme Court held that confession of co-accused are very weak evidence and no conviction can be based solely on such confession?