Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-9 section-3

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19

81.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that "any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntarily administered test result can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."?

A. Selvi v. State of Karnataka

B. C. Muniappam v. State of Tamil Nadu

C. Sunderlal Kanaiyalal v. State of Maharashtra

D. C. Mangesh v. State of Karnaiaka

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

82.
Which one of the following does not fall within the definition of the term Court under Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

A. All Judges

B. All Magistrates

C. All Consumer Forums

D. All persons legally authorised to take evidence

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

83.
Recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Raju Devade v. State of Maharashtra deals with:

A. Dying declaration

B. Hostile witness

C. Child witness

D. Expert witness

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

84.
Under Section-47 A of the Indian Evidence Act, disputed electronic signature of any person can be proved by

A. Opinion of Expert

B. Opinion of the verifying authority who has issued the Electronic Signature Certificate

C. Comparison of the electronic signature by the court itself

D. All of these

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

85.
When the Indian Evidence Act declares one fact to be conclusive proof of another the court.

A. May regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, or may call for proof of it

B. Shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved

C. Shall regard the other as proved

D. Shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

86.
Evidence of an accomplice is relevant

A. Under Section 133

B. Under Section 124

C. Under Section 134

D. Under Section 167

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

87.
Match the columns:

Column-I Column-II

a. Theft 1. Deception

b. Criminal misappropriation of property 2. Only movable property

c. Criminal Breach of trust 3. Taking without consent

d. Cheating 4. Entrustment of property

A. a-2, b-3, c-1, d-4

B. a-3, b-2, c-1, d-4

C. a-3, b-2, c-4, d-1

D. a-1, b-2, c-4, d-3

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

88.
What is 'Shall Presume' in regard to a fact?

A. Final proof

B. Court may presume that the fact is proved

C. Court shall presume the fact as proved unless it is disproved

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

89.
Queen v. Abdulla (1885) All 385 case Law is related to

A. Conduct

B. Consequences

C. Motive

D. Preparation

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

90.
Under Evidence Act, confession of one accused is admissible in evidence against co-accused-

A. If they are tried jointly for the same offence

B. If they are tried jointly for different offences

C. If they are tried for the same offences but not jointly

D. If they are tried for different offences and also not jointly

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Column-I	Column-II
a. Theft	1. Deception
b. Criminal misappropriation of property	2. Only movable property
c. Criminal Breach of trust	3. Taking without consent
d. Cheating	4. Entrustment of property

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

81. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that "any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntarily administered test result can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."?

Answer & Solution

82. Which one of the following does not fall within the definition of the term Court under Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

Answer & Solution

83. Recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Raju Devade v. State of Maharashtra deals with:

Answer & Solution

84. Under Section-47 A of the Indian Evidence Act, disputed electronic signature of any person can be proved by

Answer & Solution

85. When the Indian Evidence Act declares one fact to be conclusive proof of another the court.

Answer & Solution

86. Evidence of an accomplice is relevant

Answer & Solution

87. Match the columns: Column-I Column-II a. Theft 1. Deception b. Criminal misappropriation of property 2. Only movable property c. Criminal Breach of trust 3. Taking without consent d. Cheating 4. Entrustment of property

Answer & Solution

88. What is 'Shall Presume' in regard to a fact?

Answer & Solution

89. Queen v. Abdulla (1885) All 385 case Law is related to

Answer & Solution

90. Under Evidence Act, confession of one accused is admissible in evidence against co-accused-

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Indian Evidence Act)

81.
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that "any information or material that is subsequently discovered with the help of voluntarily administered test result can be admitted, in accordance with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."?

82.
Which one of the following does not fall within the definition of the term Court under Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

83.
Recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Raju Devade v. State of Maharashtra deals with:

84.
Under Section-47 A of the Indian Evidence Act, disputed electronic signature of any person can be proved by

85.
When the Indian Evidence Act declares one fact to be conclusive proof of another the court.

86.
Evidence of an accomplice is relevant

87.
Match the columns:

Column-I Column-II

a. Theft 1. Deception

b. Criminal misappropriation of property 2. Only movable property

c. Criminal Breach of trust 3. Taking without consent

d. Cheating 4. Entrustment of property

88.
What is 'Shall Presume' in regard to a fact?

89.
Queen v. Abdulla (1885) All 385 case Law is related to

90.
Under Evidence Act, confession of one accused is admissible in evidence against co-accused-