Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-4 section-12

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19 Section 20 Section 21 Section 22 Section 23 Section 24 Section 25 Section 26 Section 27 Section 28

31.
In which case the court made a clear distinction between 'common intention' and 'similar intention'?

A. Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor

B. Mahboob Shah v. King Emperor

C. Kripal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

D. Rishi Deo Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

32.
If a person spits on the face of another person, he shall be guilty of:

A. Assault

B. Battery

C. Use of force

D. Both A and B

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

33.
The offence of 'Dacoity' is defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in

A. Section 391

B. Section 392

C. Section 393

D. Section 394

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

34.
"A" agree with "B" that he will help "B" in copying in his examination; this is an act of

A. Criminal conspiracy

B. Abetment

C. Common intention

D. Common object

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

35.
A' intending to murder 'B' by poisoning, purchases poison and mixes the same with a glass of water. He gives the glass to the bearer to serve 'B'. The bearer while approaching , 'B' loses balance and the glass drops out of his plate. Which one of the following statements is correct in this context?

A. 'A' has committed no offence

B. A' has committed the offence of attempt to commit culpable homicide

C. A' has committed the offence of abetment

D. A' has committed the offence of attempt to murder

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

36.
"Common Intention" and "similar intention" was distinguished in the famous case of

A. Barendra K. Ghosh v. King, 1925 PC 1

B. Mehboob Shah v. Emperor, 1943 PC 118

C. Kripal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1954 SC 706

D. Rishidev Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1955 SC 331

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

37.
Possession of Indian coin by a person who knew it to be counterfeit when he became possessed thereof is dealt under-

A. Section 242 of Indian Penal Code

B. Section 243 of Indian Penal Code

C. Section 244 of Indian Penal Code

D. Section 245 of Indian Penal Code

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

38.
Fraudulently' has been defined as doing anything with intent to defraud

A. Section 23

B. Section 25

C. Section 24

D. Section 26

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

39.
Which one of the following is not an illustration of grievous hurt?

A. Emasculation

B. Dislocation of bone

C. Permanent disfiguration of face

D. Hurt which causes the sufferer in severe bodily pain for the period of 15 days

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

40.
X ordered his employee Y to beat Z. Y refuses. Now

A. X has committed abetment & Y has committed assault

B. X has committed abetment & Y has committed no offence

C. X & Y both have committed no offence

D. X has committed no offence but Y has committed offence of subordination

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

31. In which case the court made a clear distinction between 'common intention' and 'similar intention'?

Answer & Solution

32. If a person spits on the face of another person, he shall be guilty of:

Answer & Solution

33. The offence of 'Dacoity' is defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in

Answer & Solution

34. "A" agree with "B" that he will help "B" in copying in his examination; this is an act of

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

36. "Common Intention" and "similar intention" was distinguished in the famous case of

Answer & Solution

37. Possession of Indian coin by a person who knew it to be counterfeit when he became possessed thereof is dealt under-

Answer & Solution

38. Fraudulently' has been defined as doing anything with intent to defraud

Answer & Solution

39. Which one of the following is not an illustration of grievous hurt?

Answer & Solution

40. X ordered his employee Y to beat Z. Y refuses. Now

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Indian Penal Code)

31.
In which case the court made a clear distinction between 'common intention' and 'similar intention'?

32.
If a person spits on the face of another person, he shall be guilty of:

33.
The offence of 'Dacoity' is defined in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in

34.
"A" agree with "B" that he will help "B" in copying in his examination; this is an act of

36.
"Common Intention" and "similar intention" was distinguished in the famous case of

37.
Possession of Indian coin by a person who knew it to be counterfeit when he became possessed thereof is dealt under-

38.
Fraudulently' has been defined as doing anything with intent to defraud

39.
Which one of the following is not an illustration of grievous hurt?

40.
X ordered his employee Y to beat Z. Y refuses. Now