Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-7 section-7

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18 Section 19 Section 20 Section 21 Section 22 Section 23 Section 24 Section 25 Section 26 Section 27 Section 28

61.
A' and 'B' have been accused of an offence where the accused persons had no intention of causing the death of any one and no injury was found on the deceased which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. As per medical opinion, the injuries were not likely to cause death. It could not be established as to which of the two accused inflicted injuries on the head of the deceased. The accused should be liable to be convicted under:

A. Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 for voluntarily causing grievous hurt

B. Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder

C. Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder

D. Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 for attempting to commit murder

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

62.
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding a criminal act done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all is

A. A separate offence itself punishable separately

B. Only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence

C. Attracted in cases of criminal conspiracy

D. Both B and C are correct

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

63.
A child offender below the age of seven years cannot even be subjected to juvenile justice proceedings, because

A. Child criminals are treated differently

B. The Juvenile Justice Act treats a child below 7 years as innocent

C. Juvenile Justice proceedings are applicable to children below the age of 18 years

D. A child below 7 years is exempt from criminal liability under section 82 of the Indian Penal Code

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

64.
The Section of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealing with trafficking of person is

A. Section 370A

B. Section 354A

C. Section 376E

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

65.
Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

A. Section 109 of Indian Penal Code

B. Section 110 of Indian Penal Code

C. Section 111 of Indian Penal Code

D. Section 112 of Indian Penal Code

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

66.
In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed

A. One year

B. Six months

C. Four months

D. Two months

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

67.
A' in good faith accuses 'Z' before a Magistrate:

A. 'A' has committed no offence

B. A' has committed the offence of defamation

C. A' has committed the offence of defamation but he can take defence under section 93 of Indian Penal Code

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

68.
Under Exception 4 of Section 300 of Indian Penal Code:

A. The offender should commit the first assault

B. The first assault should be from the deceased

C. The first assault may be by a third person

D. The first assault may be either by the offender or by the deceased

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

69.
When all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused then:

A. The inference of guilt can be justified

B. The inference of guilt cannot be justified

C. Benefit of doubt should be given

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

70.
Indian Penal Code: X intended to kill A but instead killed B whom he had no intention to kill under which doctrine is X liable for the murder of B.

A. Doctrine of extended malice

B. Doctrine of mens rea

C. Doctrine of diminished responsibility

D. Doctrine of transfer of malice

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Answer & Solution

62. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding a criminal act done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all is

Answer & Solution

63. A child offender below the age of seven years cannot even be subjected to juvenile justice proceedings, because

Answer & Solution

64. The Section of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealing with trafficking of person is

Answer & Solution

65. Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

Answer & Solution

66. In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed

Answer & Solution

67. A' in good faith accuses 'Z' before a Magistrate:

Answer & Solution

68. Under Exception 4 of Section 300 of Indian Penal Code:

Answer & Solution

69. When all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused then:

Answer & Solution

70. Indian Penal Code: X intended to kill A but instead killed B whom he had no intention to kill under which doctrine is X liable for the murder of B.

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Indian Penal Code)

62.
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code regarding a criminal act done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all is

63.
A child offender below the age of seven years cannot even be subjected to juvenile justice proceedings, because

64.
The Section of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 dealing with trafficking of person is

65.
Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

66.
In case of an offence punishable with fine only, an offender who is sentenced to pay a fine exceeding Rs. 100, the imprisonment in default of payment of fine shall not exceed

67.
A' in good faith accuses 'Z' before a Magistrate:

68.
Under Exception 4 of Section 300 of Indian Penal Code:

69.
When all the incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be incompatible with the innocence of the accused then:

70.
Indian Penal Code: X intended to kill A but instead killed B whom he had no intention to kill under which doctrine is X liable for the murder of B.