11. X, the owner of a car, asked his friend Y to drive the car to his office. As the car was near his (X's) office, it hit a pedestrian P on account of Y's negligent driving and injured him seriously. P sued X for damages. Which one of the following is correct regarding the above?
12. Match List-I and List-II and select the correct answer by using the below the Lists:
List I
List II
a. Consent
1. Nichols v. Marsland
b. Inevitable Accident
2. Vaughan v. Taff Valde Rail Co.
c. Act of God
3. Holmes v. Mather
d. Statutory Authority
4. Hall v. Brookland Auto Racing Club
| List I | List II |
| a. Consent | 1. Nichols v. Marsland |
| b. Inevitable Accident | 2. Vaughan v. Taff Valde Rail Co. |
| c. Act of God | 3. Holmes v. Mather |
| d. Statutory Authority | 4. Hall v. Brookland Auto Racing Club |
13. Heat constitutes-
14. Which one of the following is not correct?
15. Action for defamation can be brought by
16. A and B, unknown to D, sought and got a lift in D's car, but on account of some mechanical defect in the car, of which D was not aware, one of the front wheels of the car got detached and flew away and the car turned turtle. A and B suffered serious injuries and later A, died of his injuries. B and A's next of kin sued D for damages for negligent driving. What defence does D have?
17. A' authorises 'B' to buy 500 cows for him. 'B' buys 500 cows and 300 calves for one sum of Rs. 50,000. 'A' is liable to pay
18. In which on the following cases is the occupier liable for negligence?
19. Whether for a wrong both tortious and criminal liability may arise?
20. The two rules (i) General Damages and (ii) Special Damages were propounded for the first time in
Read More Section(Law of Torts)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Law of Torts. To get more questions visit other sections.