91. The general remedy in law of tort is-
92. D left his horse and van unattended in a crowded street and went to see his friend in the adjoining street. While D was away, a dog barked and pounced on the horse. The horse got frightened and started running furiously along the road with the van. P, a pedestrian, saw X in danger of being run over and in order to save him pushed him away, but in doing so, he himself was injured. P sues D for damages:
93. A man's reputation is his property, and if possible, more valuable, than other property. Itwas so observed in
94. A music teacher committing sexual intercourse with a minor girl having obtained her consent for the same on the pretext of that the same is required to improve her voice, was held guilty of rape in
95. The doctrine 'res-ipsa loquitur' is a
96. When two or more persons commit same tort against the same plaintiff, they may be:-
97. A is playing his music system at a low pitch. His "neighbour" B, who cannot bear the noise of this music because he is suffering from a heart ailment, gets a heart attack as a result. B sues A for nuisance. A is:
98. Remoteness of damages is determined by
99. If an act is otherwise lawful, it does not become unlawful merely because the same has been done with an evil motive. This principle was enunciated in
100. Which one of the following is the ratio decidendi of the case of Rylands v. Fletcher?
1. A person is liable if he brings on his land some dangerous thing
2. The liability arises not because there was any fault on the person but because he kept some dangerous thing on his land
3. Even if the defendant was not negligent in causing the harm, he could still be made liable under the rule
4. A person, who for his own purposes brings on his lands and keeps there anything which is likely to do mischief if it escapes, is prima facie answerable for the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1. A person is liable if he brings on his land some dangerous thing
2. The liability arises not because there was any fault on the person but because he kept some dangerous thing on his land
3. Even if the defendant was not negligent in causing the harm, he could still be made liable under the rule
4. A person, who for his own purposes brings on his lands and keeps there anything which is likely to do mischief if it escapes, is prima facie answerable for the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Read More Section(Law of Torts)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Law of Torts. To get more questions visit other sections.