Law Of Torts MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question Page-4 section-9

Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10

31.
Vidyawati v. State of Rajasthan is a case Law relating to

A. Tortuous liability of corporations

B. Tortuous liability of a company

C. Vicarious Liability of State

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

32.
The doctrine 'rest ipsa loquitur' does not apply

A. When two inferences are possible

B. When the thing which causes the damage is not in the exclusive control of the defendant

C. Both (A) and (B)

D. Neither (A) nor (B)

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

33.
In a suit, for defamation, a defendant can plead privilege to two kinds

A. Absolute and Qualified

B. Codified and Uncodified

C. Local and Individual

D. Private and Public

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

34.
Match the following pairs and select the correct answer from the given below:

a. Damnum Sine Injuria 1. Overseas Tankship (U.K) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engg. Co. Ltd.

b. Defamation 2. Nagendra Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

c. Remoteness of damages 3. Tolley v. J. S. Fry and Sons Ltd.

d. Vicarious Liability 4. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal

A. a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2

B. a-4, b-2, c-1, d-3

C. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3

D. a-2, b-3, c-4, d-1

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

35.
Vis major is a defence for the torts of

A. Negligence

B. Nuisance

C. Strict liability

D. Vicarious liability

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

36.
About five firms of shipowners who were engaged in carrying tea from India to European countries combined together and offered forty per cent discount off freight booked through anyone of the five companies. This resulted in the monopoly of trade by them and totally ruined two other shipping companies engaged in the same business.

A. The five companies have committed the tort of conspiracy as they have caused damage to the other companies

B. The combination was in furtherance of their interests and the damage to the other companies is merely consequential. They are not guily of conspiracy

C. Combination of more than two persons resulting in damage to a third person constitutes conspiracy

D. Promotion of one's own interest by any combination resulting in damage to a third person is conspiracy

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

37.
A master is liable for the wrongs of his servants if the servant acts:-

A. During his duty hours

B. In the course of his employment

C. For the benefit of his master

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

38.
Which of the following is the correct explanation of the principle of absolute liability?

A. Where an enterprise is engaged in inherently dangerous activity, the persons engaged in the activity are liable irrespective of the fact whether they took reasonable care in carrying out such activity or not

B. Where an enterprise is engaged in a dangerous activity, the persons engaged in the activity are not liable if they took reasonable care in carrying out such activity

C. Where an enterprise is engaged in inherently dangerous activity, the persons engaged in the activity are liable only if they were at fault

D. There is no absolute liability in any case

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

39.
X while travelling as a passenger in a railway, was injured on account of the negligence of the railway, an action lies:

A. Only for breach of contractual duty of safe travel

B. Only for the tort of negligence

C. For both, i.e. for breach of contractual obligation and for the commission of tort

D. X must exercise an option. He can either sue in tort or for breach of contract

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

40.
Unreasonable interference in the use or enjoyment of land resulting in some damage constitute:

A. Private nuisance

B. Public nuisance

C. Trespass to Land

D. None of the above

Answer & Solution Discuss in Board Save for Later

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

a. Damnum Sine Injuria	1. Overseas Tankship (U.K) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engg. Co. Ltd.
b. Defamation	2. Nagendra Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
c. Remoteness of damages	3. Tolley v. J. S. Fry and Sons Ltd.
d. Vicarious Liability	4. Town Area Committee v. Prabhu Dayal

Law Of Torts MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

31. Vidyawati v. State of Rajasthan is a case Law relating to

Answer & Solution

32. The doctrine 'rest ipsa loquitur' does not apply

Answer & Solution

33. In a suit, for defamation, a defendant can plead privilege to two kinds

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

35. Vis major is a defence for the torts of

Answer & Solution

Answer & Solution

37. A master is liable for the wrongs of his servants if the servant acts:-

Answer & Solution

38. Which of the following is the correct explanation of the principle of absolute liability?

Answer & Solution

39. X while travelling as a passenger in a railway, was injured on account of the negligence of the railway, an action lies:

Answer & Solution

40. Unreasonable interference in the use or enjoyment of land resulting in some damage constitute:

Answer & Solution

Read More Section(Law of Torts)

31.
Vidyawati v. State of Rajasthan is a case Law relating to

32.
The doctrine 'rest ipsa loquitur' does not apply

33.
In a suit, for defamation, a defendant can plead privilege to two kinds

35.
Vis major is a defence for the torts of

37.
A master is liable for the wrongs of his servants if the servant acts:-

38.
Which of the following is the correct explanation of the principle of absolute liability?

39.
X while travelling as a passenger in a railway, was injured on account of the negligence of the railway, an action lies:

40.
Unreasonable interference in the use or enjoyment of land resulting in some damage constitute: