21. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the given below the lists:
List-I
List-II
a. Decision given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration
1. The Right of Minorities in the upper Silesia (Minority schools)
b. The principle/doctrine of Forum Progratum was enunciated in the case
2. Pious Fund case
c. A leading case on "reprisal" is:
3. The Asylum (Colombia v. Peru) Case
d. Case decided by International Court of Justice under 'Contentious Jurisdiction'
4. Naulilaa incident
| List-I | List-II |
| a. Decision given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration | 1. The Right of Minorities in the upper Silesia (Minority schools) |
| b. The principle/doctrine of Forum Progratum was enunciated in the case | 2. Pious Fund case |
| c. A leading case on "reprisal" is: | 3. The Asylum (Colombia v. Peru) Case |
| d. Case decided by International Court of Justice under 'Contentious Jurisdiction' | 4. Naulilaa incident |
22. A cheques can be presented, within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn:
23. The offence of 'dishonor' of cheque excludes -
24. Which provision of the Act deals with the effect of declaration -
25. Read the following statements:
(1) There is a rebuttable presumption that a cheque bearing a date was made or drawn on such date.
(2) It cannot be presumed that the holder of a cheque is a holder in due course.
(3) There is an irrebuttable presumption that the cheque was made or drawn for consideration.
Select the correct answer:
(1) There is a rebuttable presumption that a cheque bearing a date was made or drawn on such date.
(2) It cannot be presumed that the holder of a cheque is a holder in due course.
(3) There is an irrebuttable presumption that the cheque was made or drawn for consideration.
Select the correct answer:
26. The dishonour of cheque is punishable if it is dishonoured due to . . . . . . .
27. Every trial under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial:
28. In which of the following, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that in a case arising from Negotiable Instruments Act, successive sentences may be directed to run concurrently if both transactions are part of single transaction?
29. In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that for rebutting statutory presumption under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Act, the evidence adduced on behalf of the complainant could be relied upon?
30. What is main objective of Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Read More Section(Negotiable Instruments Act)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Negotiable Instruments Act. To get more questions visit other sections.