"A fact in personal knowledge of the judge cannot be taken in evidence". In which case this had been held?
A. Har Prasad v. Shiva Dayal, (1876) 31A 259
B. Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1952 ACR 536
C. Virendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor, ILR (1910) 37 Cal 474
D. Pushpa Devi Ramjatia v. M. L. Wadhwa, AIR 1987 SC 1748
Answer: Option A
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered

Join The Discussion