A' promises 'B' to drop a prosecution which he has instituted against 'B' for robbery and 'B' promises to restore the value of the things taken.
A. The agreement is void, as the consideration for it is unlawful
B. The agreement is void as the value of the things taken in uncertain
C. The agreement is void, as its object is unlawful
D. The agreement is void, as the object of it is illegal
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion