A sells, by auction, to his daughter, a horse which 'A' knows to be unsound and 'A' says nothing about the horse's unsoundness
A. This a fraud
B. This not a fraud
C. This is misrepresentation
D. None of these
Answer: Option A
Solution (By Examveda Team)
Let's break down why the correct answer is Option A: This is fraud.What is Fraud?
Fraud, in contract law, means intentionally deceiving someone to get them to enter into an agreement.
Key Elements of Fraud:
* False statement or concealment: There must be a statement that's not true, or important information hidden.
* Knowledge: The person making the statement must know it's false, or be recklessly indifferent to its truth.
* Intent to deceive: The person must intend for the other party to act on the false statement.
* Actual deception and damages: The other party must actually be deceived and suffer a loss because of it.
Why this scenario is fraud:
* A knows the horse is unsound: 'A' has knowledge that the horse is defective.
* A says nothing: By remaining silent about the horse's unsoundness, 'A' is concealing a crucial fact.
* Auction to his daughter: Selling to his daughter doesn't change the fact that he's concealing information. The relationship might even suggest a greater duty to disclose.
* Intent to deceive is implied: Since 'A' knows the horse is unsound and doesn't disclose it, it can be inferred that he intends to deceive the buyer (even if it's his daughter) into thinking the horse is sound.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option B: This is not fraud: This is incorrect because 'A' is intentionally concealing a defect that he knows about, which fits the definition of fraud.
* Option C: This is misrepresentation: Misrepresentation is an untrue statement of fact. Fraud goes a step further and includes the element of intent to deceive. Since 'A' knows about the unsoundness and deliberately hides it, this goes beyond simple misrepresentation and becomes fraud. It involves intentional concealment which is the key difference from misrepresentation.
* Option D: None of these: Fraud is the appropriate answer in this case, so this is also incorrect.
Therefore, Option A: This is fraud is the most accurate answer because 'A' intentionally concealed a known defect to deceive the buyer.
Join The Discussion
Comments (1)
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above

Correct ans is A