A trader supplied to a minor wheat and rice required for food. On the failure of the minor to pay, for it, the trader files a suit.
The trader
A. Will get no relief since minor's agreements are void
B. Will get no relief since the supplies were not made at the desire of the minor
C. Can recover the price of the goods supplied, as there was an implied promise
D. Is entitled to be reimbursed out of the property of the minor, since the articles supplied constitute necessaries
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion