A wife had only seen a speeding vehicle, which had crushed the husband at a little distance. She had not seen the accident herself. The husband died of heart attack a day later. Can wife's evidence be taken of what the injured husband said to her after the accident?
A. Yes, it being a dying declaration
B. No, it is merely a hearsay evidence
C. No, because it is a privileged communication
D. Yes, it being a part of res-gestae
Answer: Option D
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion