Examveda
Examveda

A written contract is proved as per Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act. Can the terms thereof be proved to have been altered by a contemporaneous oral agreement by a third party to the written contract?

A. Terms of a written contract can never be varied

B. The oral agreement can be proved to vary the terms of the written contract only if the original written contract is lost or destroyed

C. The terms of the written contract are only binding between the parties to the document but a third party to the written contract can always show contemporaneous oral agreement to vary the terms of the written contract

D. A third party cannot lead evidence to vary the terms of a written contract as he was not a party to the contract

Answer: Option C


This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Evidence Act

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, permits the use of discovery evidence, which lays down strictly as to how much of the information contained in the statement of the accused is made admissible. Which one of the following information is relevant under this Section?

A. That relates to only the place of occurrence

B. That relates to nature of the object

C. That relates to the past user of the object

D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered