According to critics of foundationalist apistemology Richard Rorty, evidence for one's beliefs can be conclusive without being necessarily conclusive or based on some indubitable principle such as Descartes 'Cogito Ergo Sum'. That is, it is sometimes legitimate to say that we 'know' something even when

A. we do not believe it

B. what we know is not based on any evidence

C. all evidence contradicts our belief

D. we might still be wrong

Answer: Option D