B' is found dead having suffered injuries with a sharp weapon, 'A' while in police custody confessed to killing 'B' with the motive of stealing his motorcycle after following him from his office and having concealed the weapon of offence i.e. a knife on his roof top. 'A' gets the knife recovered before the police. In this case, under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act, the following would be admissible:
A. Entire statement including motive of stealing the motor cycle and manner in which the murder was committed, i.e. following victim 'B' from his office, except the confession
B. The place from which the knife was produced and the knowledge of 'A' leading to recovery of knife
C. The fact that 'A' had murdered 'B' with the knife
D. Nothing is admissible as the statement was made to a police officer after 'A' was arrested
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion