Confession of a co-accused, not required to be an oath and cannot be tested by cross examination
1. Is no evidence within the meaning of Section 3 of Evidence Act and cannot be the foundation of a conviction
2. The only limited use which can be made of a confession of a co-accused is by way of furnishing an additional reason for believing such other evidences as exists
3. It is a very weak type of evidence and is much weaker even than the evidence of an approver .
In the aforesaid propositions:

Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?

A. Section 122

B. Section 123

C. Section 124

D. Section 125

'B', 'C' and 'D' never saw 'A' writing. But they give their opinion about the handwriting of 'A'. The opinion of which one is relevant?

A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'

B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence

C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice

D. Of all the above

The privilege to withhold the documents/information under the administrative law is enacted in which of the following Sections of the Evidence Act?

A. Section 120

B. Section 126

C. Section 123

D. Section 98

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, permits the use of discovery evidence, which lays down strictly as to how much of the information contained in the statement of the accused is made admissible. Which one of the following information is relevant under this Section?

A. That relates to only the place of occurrence

B. That relates to nature of the object

C. That relates to the past user of the object

D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered