Confessional statements are made by the conspirators after they were arrested, implicating other co-accused as co-conspirators. As regards admissibility of the statement which one of the following is correct?
A. The statement is admissible under Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act
B. The statement is hit by Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution and hence inadmissible
C. The statement is inadmissible because common intention was no longer in existence as held in the Parliament attack case
D. The statement is admissible under Article 19(a) of the Indian Constitution
Answer: Option C
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion