Consider the following statements:
The liability of the infant for necessaries supplied to him is:
(1) contractual and can be enforced against him.
(2) quasi-contractual and the rule is embodied in Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act.
(3) limited only to the property of the infant, if any.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A. (1) and (2)
B. (2) and (3)
C. (1) and (3)
D. Only (2)
Answer: Option B
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion