Examveda

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be more than one High Court in each state in India?

Arguments :
I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.
II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

A. Only argument I is strong

B. Only argument II is strong

C. Either I or II is strong

D. Neither I nor II is strong

E. Both I and II are strong

Answer: Option B

Solution (By Examveda Team)

Clearly, an increase in the number of High Courts will surely speed up the work and help to do away with the pending cases. So, argument II holds strong. In light of this, the expenditure incurred would be 'utilization', not 'wastage' of money. So, argument I does not hold.

This Question Belongs to Competitive Reasoning >> Statement And Arguments

Join The Discussion

Comments (3)

MD RAMISH:

7 years ago

Ye ho sakta hai ki judge increase kr diye jaye ya phir, local Court increase kr diye jaye backlog cases reduce krne keliye.
MD RAMISH:

7 years ago

Ek high court kuch order krega to dusra high court kuch order krega, to phir kiski baat mani jayegi.
MD RAMISH:

7 years ago

Sir ji, Ek maidan mai do sher kha hota hai?

Related Questions on Statement And Arguments

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world.
II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be a complete ban on manufacture of fire-crackers in India ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
II. Yes, the fire-cracker manufacture use child labour to a large extent.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should election expenses to Central and State legislatures be met by the government ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, it will put an end to political corruption.
II. No, it is not used in any country.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should the retirement age for academicians be raised to 65 years ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will be unfair to the non-academicians having lower age limit for retirement.
II. Yes, experienced academicians can greatly contribute to the nation's intellectual property.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer