Examveda

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should "literacy" be the minimum criterion for becoming a voter in India?

Arguments :
I. No. Mere literacy is no guarantee of political maturity of an individual.
II. Yes. Illiterate people are less likely to make politically wiser decisions of voting for a right candidate or party.
III. No. Voting is the constitutional right of every citizen.

A. None is strong

B. Only I and II are strong

C. Only III is strong

D. Only II and III are strong

E. All are strong

Answer: Option E

Solution (By Examveda Team)

Clearly, illiterate people lack will power and maturity in thoughts. They may easily be misled into false convictions or lured into temptations to vote for a particular group. So, argument II holds. However, a person is literate does not mean that he is conscious of all political movements, which requires practical awareness of everyday events. Thus, I also holds strong. Besides, Constitution has extended the right to vote equally to all its citizens. Hence, III also holds.

This Question Belongs to Competitive Reasoning >> Statement And Arguments

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Statement And Arguments

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world.
II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be a complete ban on manufacture of fire-crackers in India ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
II. Yes, the fire-cracker manufacture use child labour to a large extent.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should election expenses to Central and State legislatures be met by the government ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, it will put an end to political corruption.
II. No, it is not used in any country.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should the retirement age for academicians be raised to 65 years ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will be unfair to the non-academicians having lower age limit for retirement.
II. Yes, experienced academicians can greatly contribute to the nation's intellectual property.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

View Answer

Directions Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments...

Solution (By Examveda Team)

Join The Discussion

Read More: MCQ Type Questions and Answers