Answer & Solution
The question asks to identify the false statement regarding communication receivers. Let's analyze each option:
Option A: The noise limiter cuts off the receiver’s output during a noise pulse.
This statement is true. A noise limiter, also known as a noise blanker, is a circuit designed to reduce the effects of impulsive noise. It detects the presence of short, intense noise pulses and temporarily cuts off the receiver's audio output during these pulses. This prevents the noise from being audible.
Option B: A product demodulator could be used for the reception of Morse code.
This statement is true. A product demodulator, also known as a multiplier demodulator, is a type of demodulator that uses multiplication to recover the original signal from a modulated carrier wave. Morse code, being a type of on-off keying (OOK), can be demodulated using a product demodulator. The product of the received signal and a locally generated carrier wave produces a signal containing the original Morse code information, which can then be processed further.
Option C: Double conversion is used to improve image rejection
This statement is true. Double conversion refers to the use of two mixer stages in a superheterodyne receiver. The first mixer converts the received RF signal to an intermediate frequency (IF). The second mixer then converts this IF to a lower IF. This significantly improves image rejection. The image frequency is a spurious signal that can interfere with the desired signal; double conversion separates the desired IF from the image frequency more effectively, thus reducing interference.
Option D: Variable sensitivity is used to eliminate selective fading
This statement is false. Selective fading is a type of fading that affects different frequencies differently. Variable sensitivity (adjusting the receiver gain) can help to some extent in coping with general signal strength variations but cannot eliminate the frequency-selective nature of selective fading. Techniques like diversity reception (using multiple antennas or paths) are more effective in combating selective fading. Variable sensitivity might reduce the impact of overall signal strength changes but will not address the problem of uneven frequency attenuation inherent in selective fading.
Conclusion:
Therefore, the false statement is Option D.
