For the admissibility of a dying declaration, it is not necessary that the statement:
A. Relates to cause of death
B. The person making the statement must be under expectation of death
C. The person making the statement must be competent
D. The statement must be complete
Answer: Option B
Solution (By Examveda Team)
Dying Declaration: A dying declaration is a statement made by a person regarding the cause of their death or the circumstances leading to it, which is admissible in court under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.Correct Answer: Option B - The person making the statement must be under expectation of death
Under the Indian Evidence Act, it is not necessary for a person making a dying declaration to be under the expectation of imminent death. Unlike English law, which requires the declarant to believe that death is certain, Indian law allows a dying declaration to be admitted even if the person did not expect to die, as long as it relates to the cause of death.
Explanation of Other Options:
Option A: Relates to cause of death - A dying declaration must relate to the cause of death or circumstances leading to it. If the statement does not pertain to the cause of death, it may not be admissible.
Option C: The person making the statement must be competent - Competency of the declarant is necessary. If the person making the dying declaration was mentally unsound or incapable of understanding the situation, the statement may not be considered valid.
Option D: The statement must be complete - A dying declaration should ideally be complete, but even if it is incomplete due to the declarant’s condition, the court may still consider the relevant portion admissible.
Thus, the key point is that unlike in English law, under Indian law, a dying declaration does not require the declarant to be under the expectation of death for it to be admissible in evidence.
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered

Join The Discussion