If instead of avoiding the contract the contractor accepts the belated performance of reciprocal obligation on the part of the employer, the innocent party i.e., the contractor, cannot claim compensation for any loss occasioned by the non-performance of the reciprocal promise by the employer at the time agreed, unless at the time of such acceptance, he gives notice to the promisor of his intention to do so. In which case it was held
A. State of Kerala v. M. A. Mathai (2007)
B. Punjab State Civil Supplies Co-op. Ltd. v. Sikander Singh (2006)
C. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. v. Jain Studios Limited (2005)
D. K. C. Skaria v. The Government of State of Kerala(2004)
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion