If it appears from the nature of the case that it was the intention of the parties to any contract that any promise contained in it should be performed by the promisor himself:
A. The promisor may employ any other person who is party to the contract to perform the promise
B. Any relative of the promisor may perform the promise on behalf of the promisor
C. Must be performed by the promisor himself
D. Any person who is not a party to a contract may perform the promise
Answer: Option C
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion