ExamVeda
Login
Home

In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar the State made...

This question belongs to Law Constitution Of India
Constitution of India
?

In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option C
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Constitution of India

Chief Election Commissioner of India may be removed by
A. Resolution of cabinet by two third majority B. Resolution of both houses C. On recommendation of Chief Justice of India D. None of these
The largest committee of Parliament of India is
A. Public Accounts Committee B. Estimates Committee C. Committee on Public Undertakings D. Joint Parliamentary Committee
Which among the following statements is/are true according to I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu?
1. Judicial Review on legislations inserted in Schedule 9 is allowed when the legislation is not in conformity with basic structure doctrine.
2. Legislation effecting Fundamental Rights can be reviewed.
A. Only 1 B. Only 2 C. Both 1 and 2 D. Neither 1 nor 2
Ordinance promulgated by President under Article 123 of the Constitution of India shall cease to operate after . . . . . . . .
A. 3 months B. 6 months C. 6 weeks D. 15 days
More Related Questions on Constitution of India