In Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar, the State made a law under Entry 54, List II and Center made a law under entry 33 of List III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy arise in such a case?
A. The question of repugnancy under Art. 254(1) between a law made by Parliament and a law made by the State legislature arises only in case both the legislations occupy the same field with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List
B. There has to be a direct conflict between the two laws
C. Both A and B have to be satisfied
D. If the laws overlap repugnancy will invariably arise
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Constitution Of India
Chief Election Commissioner of India may be removed by
A. Resolution of cabinet by two third majority
B. Resolution of both houses
C. On recommendation of Chief Justice of India
D. None of these
The largest committee of Parliament of India is
A. Public Accounts Committee
B. Estimates Committee
C. Committee on Public Undertakings
D. Joint Parliamentary Committee
A. Only 1
B. Only 2
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
A. 3 months
B. 6 months
C. 6 weeks
D. 15 days
Join The Discussion