In the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal and Others, the Supreme Court held that non-bailable warrant should be:
A. Issued only when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result of bringing a person to court
B. Liberally issued to ensure speedy justice
C. Used only in offences against the human body
D. Declared as unconstitutional
Answer: Option A
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion