In the case of Inder Mohan Goswami & Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others, the Supreme Court held that non-bailable warrant should be:
A. Issued only when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result of bringing a person to court
B. Liberally issued to ensure speedy justice
C. Used only in offences against the human body
D. Declared as unconstitutional
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Criminal Procedure
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion