In the context of section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Kamataka High Court in Sarojamma Huchegonder v. Eshwarappa held that the right.
A. Under the provision is a personal right, and can be exercised only by the complainant and not by her legal representatives
B. Under the provision is not a personal right and can be exercised by legal representatives
C. Can be exercised only to clear the name of the accused person
D. Can be delegated
Answer: Option A
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion