In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number of witnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made
A. Surendra Prasad Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2005 SC 125
B. Syed Ibrahim v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2006 SC 2908
C. Rajinder v. State of Haryana, AIR 2006 SC 21
D. Jagdish Murav v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 35
Answer: Option B
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion