In which judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that a complaint based on a second or successive dishonor of cheque is maintainable, if no complaint based on an earlier dishonor of cheque followed by statutory notice issued on the basis thereof had been filed:

The term 'legal representative' in section 29 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

A. Does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Praoin, AIR 1926 Mad 389)

B. Includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390)

C. Includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389)

D. Includes only administrators but does not include executors (P. K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179)

In the case of a promissory note which is not negotiable

A. Notice of dishonour is compulsory

B. No notice of dishonour is necessary

C. Negotiable Instruments Act is silent on this aspect

D. Indorsement is necessary

The endorsement of a negotiable instrument is followed by delivery

A. Yes

B. No

C. Both (A) and (B)

D. None of the above

'Truncated Cheque' is dealt within which section of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

A. Section 5

B. Section 6

C. Section 7

D. Section 8