In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that for rebutting statutory presumption under Section 118(a) and 139 of the Act, the evidence adduced on behalf of the complainant could be relied upon?

A. Does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Praoin, AIR 1926 Mad 389) B. Includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390) C. Includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389) D. Includes only administrators but does not include executors (P. K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179)

A. Notice of dishonour is compulsory B. No notice of dishonour is necessary C. Negotiable Instruments Act is silent on this aspect D. Indorsement is necessary

A. Yes B. No C. Both (A) and (B) D. None of the above

A. Section 5 B. Section 6 C. Section 7 D. Section 8