Examveda
Examveda

In which of the following cases did the court held that a party who produces witnesses in court produces them as witnesses of truth; and simply because portions of their statements are not favourable to the party producing them, they cannot be condemned as biased witnesses?

A. Gyasuddin Khan vs. State of Bihar, AIR 2004 SC 201 : 2004 CrLJ 395

B. Lekhraj vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 1998 SC 242 : 1998 CrLJ 396

C. Gulabchand Ganbhiramal vs. Kudilal Govindram, AIR 1959 MP 151 : 1961 CrW 55 (FB)

D. Siddiqua vs. Narcotics Control Bureau, 2007 CrLJ 1471 (Del)

Answer: Option C


This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Evidence Act

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, permits the use of discovery evidence, which lays down strictly as to how much of the information contained in the statement of the accused is made admissible. Which one of the following information is relevant under this Section?

A. That relates to only the place of occurrence

B. That relates to nature of the object

C. That relates to the past user of the object

D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered