In which of the following cases did the court held that a party who produces witnesses in court produces them as witnesses of truth; and simply because portions of their statements are not favourable to the party producing them, they cannot be condemned as biased witnesses?
A. Gyasuddin Khan vs. State of Bihar, AIR 2004 SC 201 : 2004 CrLJ 395
B. Lekhraj vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 1998 SC 242 : 1998 CrLJ 396
C. Gulabchand Ganbhiramal vs. Kudilal Govindram, AIR 1959 MP 151 : 1961 CrW 55 (FB)
D. Siddiqua vs. Narcotics Control Bureau, 2007 CrLJ 1471 (Del)
Answer: Option C
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion