In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?
A. Anil Kumar v. B. S. Neelakanta, AIR 2010 SC 2715
B. Viveta Gazra v. State, AIR 2010 SC 2712
C. Union of India v. A. Kumar, AIR 2010 SC 2735
D. C. Magesh v. State of Karnaiaka, AIR 2010 SC 2768
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Criminal Procedure
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion