In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?

A. Three hundred rupees B. Four hundred rupees C. Five hundred rupees D. Any Amount

A. Section 310A B. Section 311A C. Section 312A D. Section 313A

A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860

A. Five years B. Four years C. Three years D. Two years