In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India reiterated the principle that the rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the right of parties but are meant to see that the parties do no resort to dilatory tactics, and seek their remedy promptly?
A. N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishna Murthy
B. Rajesh Sahu v. Sanjay
C. Disha Constructions v. State
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Limitation Act
Related Questions on Limitation Act
Tort' in the Limitation Act, 1963 includes which of following?
A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust
B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust
C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust
D. None of these
A. 1 year
B. 2 years
C. 3 years
D. No limitation
What is the period of limitation for filing a suit under Article 113 of the Limitation Act?
A. 5 years
B. 6 months
C. 3 years
D. 6 years
A. 22
B. 24
C. 26
D. 27
E. None of the above
Join The Discussion