Is it correct that in a contract of sale of goods under the Sale of Goods Act if the goods received are not as per the terms of the contract then the buyer in all cases has no liability to pay for the goods which are received by him from the seller?
A. Yes, he is not liable because no buyer can be imposed a liability for receiving contracted goods
B. Yes, he is not liable till he gives intimation in writing of acceptance
C. Yes, he is not liable if he has intimated to the seller within reasonable time that the goods have been rejected
D. No, he is liable because of the principle "buyer beware"
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Sale Of Goods Act
The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 is based on:
A. The English Bill of Exchange Act, 1882
B. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882
C. The English Sale of Goods Act, 1893
D. The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Which of the following is not the right of an unpaid seller under Sale of Goods Act, 1930:
A. Right of lien on goods for the price while the goods are in possession of seller
B. Right of stopping the goods in transit, in case of insolvency of buyer
C. Right of resale as limited by the Act
D. Right of withholding delivery where the property in the goods has passed to the buyer
Under section 9 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, what is a reasonable price is
A. A question of fact
B. A question of law
C. A mixed question of fact and law
D. Only (C) and not (A) or (B)
Before the enactment of Sale of Goods Act, the provisions regarding Sale of Goods were contained in:
A. Indian Contract Act, 1872
B. Indian Registration Act, 1908
C. Transfer of Property Act, 1882
D. Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Join The Discussion