Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using...

Home / Law / Negotiable Instruments Act / Question

Examveda

Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the given below the lists:

List-I List-II

a. Decision given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration 1. The Right of Minorities in the upper Silesia (Minority schools)

b. The principle/doctrine of Forum Progratum was enunciated in the case 2. Pious Fund case

c. A leading case on "reprisal" is: 3. The Asylum (Colombia v. Peru) Case

d. Case decided by International Court of Justice under 'Contentious Jurisdiction' 4. Naulilaa incident

A. a-2, b-1, c-4, d-3

B. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4

C. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2

D. a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1

Answer: Option A

This Question Belongs to Law >> Negotiable Instruments Act

Related Questions on Negotiable Instruments Act

A. Does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Praoin, AIR 1926 Mad 389)

B. Includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390)

C. Includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389)

D. Includes only administrators but does not include executors (P. K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179)

View Answer

A. Notice of dishonour is compulsory

B. No notice of dishonour is necessary

C. Negotiable Instruments Act is silent on this aspect

D. Indorsement is necessary

View Answer

A. Yes

B. No

C. Both (A) and (B)

D. None of the above

View Answer

A. Section 5

B. Section 6

C. Section 7

D. Section 8

View Answer

List-I	List-II
a. Decision given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration	1. The Right of Minorities in the upper Silesia (Minority schools)
b. The principle/doctrine of Forum Progratum was enunciated in the case	2. Pious Fund case
c. A leading case on "reprisal" is:	3. The Asylum (Colombia v. Peru) Case
d. Case decided by International Court of Justice under 'Contentious Jurisdiction'	4. Naulilaa incident