Offer as defined under section 2(a) is
A. Communication from one person to another
B. Suggestion by one person to another
C. Willingness to do or abstain from doing an act in order to obtain the assent of other thereto
D. None of the above
Answer: Option C
Solution (By Examveda Team)
The correct answer is Option C: Willingness to do or abstain from doing an act in order to obtain the assent of other theretoFirst, let's define what an offer is in the context of the Indian Contract Act.
Under Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an offer is defined as "when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal." In simpler terms, an offer is a clear expression of willingness by one party (the offeror) to enter into a contract with another party (the offeree) on specific terms.
Why Option C is correct:
Option C accurately reflects this definition. It highlights the two key components of an offer: willingness to perform (or not perform) an act and the intention to obtain the other party's assent (agreement). The offeror is essentially making a proposal, indicating their readiness to enter into a contract if the offeree accepts the terms.
Why other options are incorrect:
Option A: Communication from one person to another is too broad. Any communication doesn't necessarily constitute an offer. It could simply be an inquiry, a statement of fact, or an invitation to treat (an invitation to make an offer).
Option B: Suggestion by one person to another is also too vague. A suggestion doesn't always carry the legal weight of an offer; it lacks the necessary firmness of intention to be legally binding.
Therefore, only Option C precisely captures the legal definition of an offer as per Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act.
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above

Join The Discussion