Principle: If any person enters into wagering or betting agreements, such agreements would be illegal and cannot be given effect for enforcing obligations.
Fact: Akbar enters into an agreement with Birbal that if he pays Akbar a premium of Rs. 500 per annum and Birbal's house is devastated by fire within one year of entering into the agreement, Akbar shall make good the loss suffered by Birbal.
A. Agreement is a wager and even if Birbal's house is destroyed, he cannot claim price from Akbar
B. Valid contract and can be enforced if Birbal's house is destroyed
C. Akbar and Birbal are betting and thus it is not a contract
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion