Ram, an accused wants to submit carbon copy of the suicide note as secondary evidence. The original is with the opposite party and he has failed to produce the same. The suicide was not within the knowledge of the accused prior to the receipt of the carbon copy. Which of the following statements will hold true for the case?
A. The evidence cannot be admitted due to applicability of Section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
B. The evidence cannot be admitted because it fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 64 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
C. The evidence cannot be admitted because it fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872
D. The evidence can be admitted as it satisfies the requirements of both Section 64 and Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion