T' coaches 'M', a minor, who is a student of Secondary School in Mathematics. Though there was no talk between the father of 'M' and 'T' with respect to any remuneration to be paid to 'T' yet the father of 'M' had knowledge of the coaching imparted by 'T'. After 'M' succeeded in his examination. 'T' demanded remuneration from father of 'M'. Which legal principle would govern the case at hand?

A) M' being minor, 'T' would have no claim against any service imparted to 'M' B) Since the father of 'M' never entered into any any contract with 'T', 'T' will not have any actionable claim C) T' would be entitled to recover from father of 'M' since father of 'M' has enjoyed the benefit of non-gratuitous act of 'T' that being coaching 'M' D) The premise would not be covered by any legal principle under the Indian laws

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option C

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

T' coaches 'M' a minor who is a student of Secondary...

Join the Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Contract Act