Examveda

"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by providing non-access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case

A. Somwanti v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 151

B. Siddaramesh v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 3 SCC 152

C. Kailash v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 107

D. Shaik Fakruddin v. Shaik Mohammad Hasan, AIR 2006 AP 48

Answer: Option D


This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Evidence Act

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, permits the use of discovery evidence, which lays down strictly as to how much of the information contained in the statement of the accused is made admissible. Which one of the following information is relevant under this Section?

A. That relates to only the place of occurrence

B. That relates to nature of the object

C. That relates to the past user of the object

D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered