"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by providing non-access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case
A. Somwanti v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 151
B. Siddaramesh v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 3 SCC 152
C. Kailash v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 107
D. Shaik Fakruddin v. Shaik Mohammad Hasan, AIR 2006 AP 48
Answer: Option D
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered

Join The Discussion