The forfeiture under section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 can . . . . . . . .
A. Not be waived off, except by express declaration of the same
B. Can be waived off by acceptance of rent becoming due after forfeiture, after the suit to eject lessee has been initiated
C. Can be waived off by accepting of rent becoming due after forfeiture, in case lessor is not aware that forfeiture has incurred
D. Can be waived off by accepting of rent becoming due after forfeiture, as long as lessor knows that forfeiture has incurred
Answer: Option D
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion