The plaintiff sees defendant's son falling in a pond. He saves the child. Later on, the defendant promises to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1000 as reward. In this context, which one of the following propositions is correct?

A) The defendant's liability to pay Rs. 1000 arises under the theory of quasi-contract. B) The defendant is not liable to pay Rs. 1000 as promised to the plaintiff C) The defendant is liable to pay Rs. 1000 to the plaintiff as the case come under section 25 of the Contract Act D) The defendant is liable to pay because the agreement is not "nudum pactum"

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option C

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

The plaintiff sees defendant's son falling in a pond He saves...

The plaintiff sees defendant's son falling in a pond. He saves the child. Later on, the defendant promises to pay the plaintiff Rs. 1000 as reward. In this context, which one of the following propositions is correct?

Join the Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Contract Act