ExamVeda
Login
Home

The Supreme Court held that the act of taking illegal possession...

This question belongs to Law Transfer Of Property Act
Transfer of Property Act
?

The Supreme Court held that the act of taking illegal possession of property or the continuance of wrongful possession of property does not amount to "otherwise dealing with the property" so as to attract section 52, even if the wrong doer be a party to the suit. This was held in case of:

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option D
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act

Which one of the following sections of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is concerned with the transfer of benefit to unborn child?
A. Section 13 B. Section 14 C. Section 15 D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens B. Part performance C. Mortgage D. Ostensible owner
In which of the following cases will the transferee get good title of the property transferred, if he acted in good faith?
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance C. Both A and B D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office B. A mere chance to succeed C. A mere right of re-entry D. All of the above
More Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act